Plans for the inclusion of more cultural activities in schools have been greeted with scepticism.

A Government scheme launched on Wednesday aims to see all students taking part in five hours of cultural activities a week, such as visiting galleries and theatres, learning to play musical instruments, and gaining experience of film-making or TV.

Ministers are concerned that children from poorer families miss out on top art exhibitions, concerts or theatre productions because their parents cannot afford tickets.

Pilot projects costing £25 million will be run in ten areas across England, with the aim of extending the scheme across the country in future.

John Dunford, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, is one of many who have questioned how realistic the plans are.

"I don't see how we can offer five hours of cultural activity plus five hours of sport, plus the new responsibility for community cohesion and give pupils their lessons at the same time."

He added: "We can't just go on placing extra burdens on schools all the time."

Michael Spinney, chairman of the Independent Association of Prep Schools, said: "To aim for five hours a week of high culture in the primary and secondary curriculum is laudable but bonkers.

"A good curriculum will enshrine cultural values and experience. To impose it will further weigh down a curriculum that is drowning in good initiatives."

Geraldine Everett, chairwoman of the Professional Association of Teachers, described the plan as "admirable but naive".

Labour MP for Thurrock Andrew Mackinlay said ministers should focus on making sure children attend "high" art events.

He said: "I welcome this as long overdue but I have some reservations.

"What is required is access to ballet, classical music, opera and quality theatre. Lloyd Webber won't do.

"There is a cultural impoverishment in this country," Mr Mackinlay said.

© Independent Television News Limited 2009. All rights reserved.